Home

One quick step

Sign in to watch

We'll remember you so you can browse the library and pick up where you left off.

No password · instant access · we’ll never spam you

See how we use your data in our Privacy Policy.

The Clause a Re-Up Misses (EN)

Investor / LPLenderGP Due DiligenceEnglishAPAC, US, Europe2:29

About this video

LP-side GP due diligence: Ellie joins the key person clause to the definitions that gut it, and reprices the 0.95% of GAV fee line.

Aldermere Public Pension Investment Board evaluates two competing logistics fund commitments: a re-up with a familiar manager and a new relationship. Ellie reads the six-document data room, returns a cited side-by-side of principal terms, exposes that the re-up fund's market-standard key person clause is hollowed out by its definitions (dual-departure trigger, GP-determined devotion, no automatic suspension), reprices the management fee against its actual AGAV base, and drafts the investment committee memo with every finding traceable to its source clause.

  • Side-by-side principal terms comparison, every cell cited to its source page
  • Key person protections joined to the defined terms that gut them
  • 0.95% 'of GAV' fee shown to charge on uncalled commitments during ramp-up
  • Draft IC memo with recommended position and 11 open items; not-found items flagged, never invented
appib-gp-ddpension-fundlp